The build quality and reliability is IMO second to none, plus the technical and customer support from Apple (but you would expect that given the price of their products). I can see it from other people's perspectives, they are expensive compared to other brands and what they can do is comparable etc. I know what you mean, I just feel lie i'm too old to learn a new OS Just wanted to balance up the opinions here but I'd rather pay a little (or a lot) more for something I know is a work of art (sorry couldn't help myself!).
I'm fully hooked into iPhone though, I've told myself I can quit whenever I want and go back to android but like you say, they "just work"īut it’s also worth considering just how squishy the need for more memory can be when you poke at it.
Sure, a lot of people feel they need it-but do they, really? #8gb vs 16gb ram macbook air 2020 android# Yes, when a Mac runs out of physical memory, it will page the contents of memory to disk-and even super-fast SSDs are slower than main memory! Though the speed differences are a lot less than back when we used slow spinning disk drives. What would cause your Mac to run out of physical memory? If you leave an awful lot of apps open at once, or if your browser has hundreds of tabs open, or if you’re using an app that loads a very large file (like, say, a Photoshop file) into memory. If you’re someone who does this a lot, you probably want more memory.
#8gb vs 16gb ram macbook air 2020 upgrade#īut then again, if you’re someone who does this a lot, you might not want to buy one an M1 Mac right now.The mid-range and high-end models that will undoubtedly offer more RAM options and more processor power are undoubtedly coming next year.īut if you combine the efficiency of the unified memory architecture with the speed of SSD storage, and consider most everyday use cases, I’m pretty sure that most regular users could get by with 8GB of unified memory-or, if you want to be absolutely sure, upgrade that to 16GB.
You know nothing of me - I'm a graphic designer, have been for over 20 years, and I need more RAM than 16gb to run the Adobe Suite and to load my 5gb images in Photoshop. Sorry - but you really don't understand the purpose of RAM - hope this clears it up for you.
Just to add to the last paragraph in the Quote - 8gb is plenty for most PC users or Mac Users - 16gb is plenty for MOST people.īut for people like me editing photos and videos over 8-12 hour periods in a single sitting of the computer - it doesn't cut the mustard.ġ6GB MacBook Pro was able to complete it in 5 minutes and 59 seconds, a time on par with the 2019 16-inch Core i9 MacBook Pro with 32GB RAM. This is down to the processor - not the RAM. My big question is - did they test this with 2019 16-inch Core i9 MacBook Pro with 16GB RAM? It's on PAR with the i9-9880H processor - which is on PAR with the i7-10875H by the way. The remark that it's ON PAR has nothing to do with the RAM. It's basically saying the M1 chip with 16gb RAM is ON PAR with the i9-9880H.Īnd once again I point to the evidence of the Football Manager Benchmark Thread carried out by everyday forum users. The M1 chip is performing similarly with 8gb or 16gb of RAM - and on PAR with the i7-10750H (in the sample sets abobe) which is a similar performance to the i9-9880H. The FM benchmarking also shows that people with the exact same M1 Laptop from Apple - with the exact same RAM - are getting different results.